Live your Unitarian Universalist values out loud. Make your year-end gift today!
Members present: Larry Ladd, Will Saunders, Ed Merck, Chris Reese, Darwin
Also present: Rev William Gardner, Jerry Gabert, Lucia Santini-Field, Nancy
Gladyszak, Richard Crowell, Glenn Charbonneau
The meeting opened with introductions.
Ladd provided a briefing on the reasons for creating the audit committee,
including its role and purpose. A recently proposed change in Massachusetts
law would mandate the Unitarian Universalist Association (UUA) compliance with
Sarbanes-Oxley. Compliance by the UUA requires the creation of an independent
audit committee that will function as a classic audit committee. The first fundamental
responsibility will be to plan for the hiring and oversight of the independent
audit firm, through the request for proposal (RFP) review process. The second
responsibility will be for the committee members to satisfy themselves with
the effectiveness of the Unitarian Universalist Association internal control
system. Third is to assess any business risks facing the UUA.
The members of the audit committee are appointed to two-year (staggered) terms
renewable for a period of up to eight years. Ladd also presented background
information on the reason for the selection of each of the members and emphasized
that his role as the founder and chairperson is temporary. One member will be
expected to assume the role of the chair.
Bill Gardiner, Director of Congregational Justice Making, joined the meeting
and provided an introduction to the Board of Trustees, all committee and taskforce,
and all UUA staff members multicultural, anti-racist, and anti-oppressive training.
Ladd briefly described the issues facing the rest of the UUA. The UUA receives
its revenue from two primary sources: the endowment and charitable giving. He
also presented information on how the UUA structures its financial statements
and reporting. Background information was provided on Beacon Press and the distinction
between accounting for a trade-publishing firm and the rest of the UUA. Ladd
further described the differences between Skinner House and Beacon Press. Beacon
Press markets to the public through commercial bookstores, while Skinner produces
what have historically been called 'denominational tracts'.
Lucia Santini-Field, Chair of the UUA Investment Committee, joined the meeting
After a break, Gabert presented background information and commentary on UUA's
annual financial statements, as audited by Deloitte & Touche, and the supplementary
statements reporting on line of business segments. The revisited budget is presented
to the October board meeting for approval. Questions were asked relating to
the funding of capital campaign expenses and the reporting of income to the
present Capital Campaign for Unitarian Universalism. Other questions were asked
about distinctions between auditing, tax, and managerial reporting. Smith and
Reece inquired about the preparation, presentation, review and approval cycle
of the operating budgets. Gabert described the multi-year budget process and
the reason for the final presentation and approval of the current year budget
by the Board of Trustees four months into the fiscal year. The budget cycle
is based on the expectation of the presentation by the Administration of a balanced
budget in January for the upcoming fiscal year. Then, once the final results
for the current fiscal year are known, the Administration reviews the budget
that has been approved by the Board, in light of the actual results, and will
make any necessary and appropriate adjustments (referred to as “framing”
the budget) for the new budget year. The revised budget is presented to the
October board meeting for approval.
Ladd then moved on to the question of the external auditors. Gabert provided
the general history of the UUA's relationship with Deloitte & Touche and
our last request for proposal (RFP) process in 2000. Ladd provided further information
on why the Finance Committee had previously put the audit out to bid. Saunders
asked if there were ethical questions or issues raised with regard to the timing
of our RFP, the audit cycle, and our relationship with Deloitte & Touche.
Santini-Field requested consideration of a separate audit of the endowment and
General Investment Fund (GIF). Smith agreed that this was an important consideration
as there appear to be aspects of the GIF that aren't clearly reported in the
recent financial statements. Ladd asked whether it was possible to price having
Deloitte audit and report on the endowment. Gabert clarified that it is already
being audited but was not completely separated from Trust and Agency components.
Smith then raised the issue that it should be the responsibility of the appropriate
committees to sign off on the footnotes before they are incorporated into the
Financial Statements. For instance, the investment committee should sign off
on the footnotes dealing with the endowment and the Congregational Properties
and Loan Commission should sign off on the CPLC business section. There is general
consensus on this issue that this should be the case on the footnotes. The audit
committee intends to take the initiative and will sign off on the FY2004 audit.
Smith asked for future clarification on the scope of the committee's authority
to make assignments to staff regarding audit responsibilities.
Discussion was had on future meeting dates and topics. A summary will be presented
at the end of the notes.
Merck asked that we review the management letter. Ladd is not overly pleased
with the management letters because of their lack of substance. He believes
that there is too much emphasis on the ‘nit-picky'. Merck shared in these
concerns and believed the reports were too anemic. He's concerned about the
lack of substantive broad-based recommendations. Reece made several further
points. Specifically, he believes that our expectations of the quality of the
audit and management letter are realistic. Further, we should be asking why
they haven't brought up some of the questions raised today. Reece asked about
the management responses and how they are arrived at. Smith reiterated that
the responses should not be written by the financial services staff but rather
by the program directors of those areas responsible. Ladd again voiced his happiness
with this group. Reece asked if it would not be important to include an income
and expenditure to budget analysis in the actual reports.
At the request of Saunders, the committee suggested that his report to the
Finance Committee focus on the following topics:
Ladd distributed a report he gave to the President's Council in October in
Long Beach, CA.
The meeting adjourned without a vote at 2:40.
Future Meeting Dates
Wednesday, August 25, 2004 (social event the evening before).
Reservations at the Eliot & Pickett House have been made for Saunders,
Reece, Smith, Merck, and Ladd.
Tuesday, October 12, 2004.
Reservations at the Pickett and Elliot House have been made for Reece and
Future agenda items
For more information contact web @ uua.org.
This work is made possible by the generosity of individual donors and congregations.
Please consider making a donation today.
Last updated on Friday, July 22, 2011.
Sidebar Content, Page Navigation
More Ways to Search
Donate to Support This Program and the Ongoing Work of the UUA
Read or subscribe to UUA.org Updates for the latest additions to our site.
Learn more about the Beliefs & Principles of Unitarian Universalism, or read our online magazine, UU World, for features on today's Unitarian Universalists. Visit an online UU church, or find a congregation near you.